| 
 
      PC based GIS land use 
      capability evaluation 
 Toshiaki Hashimoto, Shunji Murai
 Institute of Industrial 
      Science, Univ. of Tokyo
 7-22, Roppoongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 
      106
 
 Norihisa Ohno
 N.C.M Co. Ltd. 4-33-22, 
      Hakusan,
 Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 112 Japan
 
 Abstract
 Land use capability can be 
      evaluated by the superposition of some kinds of geographic informations 
      such as land uses. Soil conditions, slope gradients, etc. This procedure 
      can be automatically carried out by a computer when the geographic 
      informations are digitized. This paper deals with the system developed by 
      the authors for land use capability classification which runs on a 
      personal computer. The contents processed by this system are the land use 
      capabilities of flood damage risk, slope failure risk and the selection of 
      suitable land for agriculture or forestry.
 
 Introduction
 Land use capability evaluations had been 
      carried out by manual superposition of some kinds of existing maps. This 
      procedure was very time consuming and had the probability that the results 
      depend on the skillfulness of interpreters. But the problems are resolved 
      by the existence of a computer which has the capability of fast data 
      handling as well as powerful information system. Computer processing has 
      another advantage of the ability to generate new data from existing data 
      such as slope gradient data derived from elevation data.
 
 On the 
      other hand, the processing ability of a personal computer has been so 
      improved that a large volume of data like remote sensing data can be 
      managed on it. The usage of a personal computer leads to the achievement 
      of a simple and cheap system for GIS.
 
 Evaluation Technique
 
        GeneralThe evaluation is based on the superposition of 
        some kinds of different factors which are independently categorized into 
        same ranks. The factors which would affect the objects to be evaluated 
        should be selected. Fig. 1 shows the objects and their factors in this 
        system. It also shows the data sources for factors. This paper 
        introduces the details of the flood damage risk and the case of 
        developing paddy fields in the selection of suitable land for 
        agriculture.
 
 The factors selected are related with natural land 
        condition and not so related with agro-economical condition, so the 
        results means only the evaluations from the view point of natural 
        aspects.
 
 
 ![]() Fig. 1. Objects, factors and data sources
 
 
Categorization of factors (score giving) The factors are 
        categorized into some ranks according to the degrees of effect on the 
        object. The scores for the selection of suitable land for agriculture 
        are different from each other because of the difference f effects, 
        although the same factors are adopted. The scores may be changes in 
        consideration of the conditions of the areas to be evaluated.
 
 
 
          Land use for flood damageThis factor indicates the 
          damage potential at a flood.
 
 3 : cities, villages, densely 
          inhabited areas
 
 2 : others (covered area like factory sites, 
          etc.)
 1 : rice fields, farms, others(uncovered area like golf 
          courses)
 0 : grass fields, forests, lakes, rivers
 
 
Land form for flood damage This factor indicates the 
          flood risk which is based on the results of correlation analyses 
          between land form and the records of former floods.
 
 3 : plain 
          in valleys, deltas, flood plains, marsh, peat areas, artificiality 
          modified areas 1 (flat, surf zones, beaches)
 2 : alluvial fans, 
          small hills (or small hilly areas), dunes, artificiality modified 
          areas 11 (exception of 1), depressions, gravel sedimentations
 1 : 
          table land
 0 : mountains, hills
 
 
Land use for the selection of suitable land for agriculture 
          This information is used for determining the area to be 
          evaluated
 
 
 
            paddy fields 
            crop lands 
            orchards 
            grass fields 
            forests 
            lakes, ponds, rivers 
            cities, villages, artificial structure ( airports, roads, etc.) 
             
Slope gradient and soil depth for the selection of suitable 
          land for developing paddy fieldsSlope gradient indicates work 
          efficiency and the probability of erosion and soil depth is related 
          with work efficiency and productivity.
 
 
 
            
            
              | Slope gradient | soil depth |  
              | 3 : < 8 degree | 100cm < |  
              | 2 : 8-15 | 100-70 |  
              | 1 : 15 -20 | 70-40 |  
              | 0 : 20 < | < 40 |  
Soil character for the selection of suitable land for 
          developing paddy fieldsThis factor indicates work efficiency, 
          productivity and the probability of erosion. If the characteristic of 
          soil is evaluated as the lack of phosphorous and/or potassium or the 
          great acidity, the score should be lowered by one rank. Soils are 
          expressed by the following acronyms.
 
 
 
            
              | S : sand or sandy | L : loam or loamy |  
              | C : clay | SI : silt |  
              | Li : Light | H : heavy |  
              | V : volcanic | G : gravel |  
              | P : PEAR | (ex. SL : sandy loam) |  3 : L, SiL, 
          SCL, CL, SiCL, SC, LiC, Sic
 2 : SL, VL, VCL
 1 : S, LS, VSL, HC, 
          P(lower)
 0 : G, VS, VSG, P(upper)
 
 
Saline distribution for the selection of suitable land for 
          developing paddy fieldsThis factor may be ignored if there is 
          no probability for salinity damages.
 
 3 : not probable for 
          salinity damage
 2 : probable for salinity damage
 1 : covered 
          with salinity of less than 10%
 0 : covered with salinity of more 
          than 10%
 
Evaluation
 
 
          Evaluation of flood damage risksThe evaluation is 
          carried out by the superposition of two factors categorized into four 
          ranks. Both ranks are multiplied as shown in Fig. 2. The ranking 
          matrix can be modified according to the conditions of the areas to be 
          evaluated. Land use and form represent the damage potential and the 
          flood risk, respectfully. So the multiplied scores can be interpreted 
          as Table 1.
 
 
Evaluation of suitability for developing paddy fieldsIn 
          land use planning, each land use has the different importance 
          according to the reasons of economy, politics, etc. So it is supposed
 
 
 ![]() Fig. 2. Ranking matrix and evaluation 
          flow
 
 Table 1 Evaluation for flood damage risk
 
 
            
            
              | Score | remarks |  
              | 0 | No Probability (not in undated) No damage even when in 
                undated
 |  
              | 1 | Smaller damage with low probability |  
              | 2 | Small or medium damage with low or medium probability |  
              | 3 | Serious damage with low probability Small damage with 
                high probability
 |  
              | 4 | Medium damage with medium probability |  
              | 6 | Medium damage with high probability Serious damage with 
                medium probability
 |  
              | 9 | Serious damage with high 
          probability |  that it is probable 
          to develop paddy fields into urban area while the reverse is 
          improbable. In this system, the present land uses to be evaluated can 
          be selected. For example, when the present land use of pasture is 
          selected for the evaluation for developing paddy fields crop lands, 
          the evaluation is carried out only for developing the specified land 
          uses.
 
 From the view point that every factor used for the 
          evaluation of agricultural suitability limits the productivity 
          independently. The total score of any point is expressed by the 
          minimum of every score of three (ore four in case of the usage of 
          saline distribution) factors. The score expressed by minimum is 
          interpreted as Table 2.
 
 
 ![]() Fig. 3. Evaluation flow
 
 Table 
      2. Evaluation for the selection of suitable land
 
 
        
        System
          | Score | remarks |  
          | 3 | well suited for developing specified land use having no or 
            slight significant li limitations |  
          | 2 | moderately suited for developing specified land use having some 
            limitations limitations |  
          | 1 | poorly suited for developing specified land use . having severe 
            limitations limitations. |  
          | 0 | not suited for developing specified land 
      use. |  
        ApplicationsHardwareFig. 4 shows the hardware configuration. The 
        personal computer of "NEC PC-9801 RA5" performs as a CPU. The hard disk 
        has the capacity 40 Mbytes. The CRT can display an image by 640 x400 
        pixels in 125 colors by dither technique.
 
 The scanner is used to 
        acquire digitized data from existing maps and photographs. It has the 
        functions as follows: a scan size is up to A3 (297 x420 mm) by one scan 
        : a color resolution is 1 byte in R.G.B. respectively : a spatial 
        resolution is up to 600 dots per inch.
 
 
 ![]() Fig. 4. Hardware 
        configuration
 
Data handlingAs mentioned above, seven kinds of data are 
        used in this system. Among these data, land use data are derived from 
        DTM which is generated from topo maps (1), other data are directly 
        derived from existing maps.
 
 All image data are in raster form 
        and every pixel is coded by a polygon ID number. There is prepared the 
        look up table where coded data can be compared with the corresponding 
        legends. Other tables for color informations and the scores for each 
        object are also prepared.
 
 
SoftwareThis system can be operated interactively by 
        using menu styles. The functions of the system are shown in Table 3.
 
 Table. 3. Functions of the system
 
 
          
          
            | 1 | To display a geographic Information |  
            | 2 | To display the results of evaluation |  
            | 3 | To set up scores |  
            | 4 | To set up color codes |  The 
        image data like geographic information are displayed in colors selected 
        among 125 colors. The colors can be changed by changing color code in 
        the color table. The scale and the location to be displayed are also 
        changeable. The image of results of evaluation can be stored.
 
 The number of image to be displayed is only one, but geographic 
        informations are overlaid. That is to say, the legend of a certain pixel 
        can be seen on the display when the type of informations to know and the 
        location are specified. For example, the legend of land use on a certain 
        pixels appears on the display while the image of land from is displayed. 
        The specification of legend and location is operated by a mouse.
 
        Flood damage potential at Nakhon SI Thammarat, Thailand 
        The area is located on the north-west of Nakhon Si Tammarat, the 
        southern part of Thailand where a serious flood damage occurred in 
        November, 1988.
 
 Land use data are prepared by a conventional 
        supervised classification method from a TM image acquired on March 30, 
        1988. The image consist of 480z480 pixels and 1 pixel correspondents to 
        50m on the ground. The land form data are derived from DTM generated 
        from topo maps, of 1/50,000. The data are adjusted o the land use data. 
        The result of evaluation is shown in Fig. 5.
 
 
 ![]() Fig. 5. Flood damage 
risk
 
 
Suitability for developing paddy fields at Khon Kaen, Thailand. 
        The area is located around Khon Kaen, the north-eastern part of 
        Thailand where the level of agro-economics is very low.
 
 TM image 
        acquired on December 18, 1987 Are classified to generate, the land use 
        data of the pixel size of 66.7m on the ground. The image consists of 
        334p x 433 lines. The slope gradient data are derived from DTM generated 
        from topo maps, of 1/50,000. The soil character and soil depth data are 
        derived directly from soil maps, of 1/250,000. The saline distribution 
        data are digitized from saline distribution maps, of 250,000. All data 
        are adjusted to the land use data. Fig . 6 shows the result of 
        evaluation.
 ![]() Fig. 6. Suitable land for developing paddy 
      field Conclusion
 A new system for land use 
      capability classifications has been developed. The system runs on a 
      personal computer and is easy to operate. GIS is useful for suitability 
      studies in land use planning and this system will contribute to this 
      field. Reference 
        S. Viseshin, T. Hashimoto, S. Murai :Interactive system for 
        Automated Generation of DTM from Existing Topo-graphical MAP of 
        Thailand", The proceeding of the ninth Asian Conference on Remote 
        Sensing, Nov. 23-29, 1988, Bangkok, Thailand, pp s-5-1-s-5-6. 
       --------------------------------------------------- Presented 
      at the tenth Asian Conference on Remote Sensing held in Kuala Lumpur, 
      Malaysia. November 23-29, 1989 
 |