Flood disaster prediction
model using Remote Sensing data and geographic information system
Shiro Ochi, Shunji
Murai Institute of Industrial Science University of Tokyo Suvit Vibulsresth National Research Council of Thailand Abstract This paper describes about the new method to analyze the flood flow. The rainfall in the mountainous area flows partly on the surface and partly under the ground depending on the runoff ratio which is determined by the geology, the land cover, the slope gradient etc.. the water on the slope surface flows in the course of the slope aspect. The slope gradient and slope aspect are computed from DEM. The authors have developed the flood flow model using the hydrographic theory. Runoff ratio has a influence on the flow rate, so even if the precipitation is the same the quantity of the flow becomes different. In our study the runoff ratios are assumed with the slope gradient and NVI which comes from the satellite data. The flood flow model allows a simulation study for various cases of vegetation cover conditions including deforestation, which will provide prediction of flood disaster. Introduction In November 1989, there occurred a serious flood disaster over NAKHON-SI-TAMARAT in southern part of Thailand. The causes of this catastrophe are considered as the following points.
Methodology
Many examples about the runoff couldn't be found, Table-1 shows a example in which three categories re considered - the land cover, the geology and the slope gradient. The land cover is classified to four classes - dense forest, sparse forest or arable land and barren land. The penetration represents the geology in this example. Slope gradient is roughly classified to three classes. On the other hand, the land cover image can be generated by level-slicing of NVI (Normalized vegetation Index) which is computed with the following formula. NVI = (I.R - R) / (1.R + R) Fog 3 shows the land cover image in 1984 on the test area using LANDSAT - MSS data and table-2 shows the relationship between land cover and NVI. From the correspondence between table 1 and table 2, the runoff ration (=a) is assumed by the following function which contains the slope gradient (=b) and NVI (=g). a = 0.01b- 0.37g+ 0.648
Fig. 4 shows the relationship of NVI between 1984's MSS data and 1988's TM data. As can be seen in Fig. 4 it si possible to assume the runoff ratio in 988 with considering the difference between the two sensors. So the following function gives the runoff ration in 1988. a = 0.01b- 0.26g+ 0.629
Table 1 Example on runoff ratio
Table 2 Relationship between NVI and landuse
The velocity in the actual flood flow changes depending on the quantity of discharge. The manning formula gives the velocity of the flow as follows v = (R 2/3X I 1/2)/N R : Hydraulics radius I : Bed gradient N : Roughness factor Fig.5 The supposed sectional shape When the sectional shape of the stream is supposed as Fig 6 the velocity increases in proportion to the third power of the quantity of the flow u µ Q1/3 Q : Quantity of the flow The arrival distance is defined in this study as the distance measured along the streamline starting from each pixel to the observation point. Fig6 shows how to compute the arrival distance. Fig.7 Arrival time Fig 6 arrival distance The total arrival time is given by accumulating subcomponents of the arrival time from a pixel to the neighbor which is derive from division of the arrival distance by the velocity. Fig - 7 shows the difference of the arrival time depending on the strength of the precipitation. When the rainfall have a unit of mm per hour, it tales 180 unit times for the water in the farthest pixel to arrive at the observation point in the example shown in Fig 7 when the rainfall has five mm per hour, the arrival time shortens to only 100 unit times. The discharge of the flow on the observation point at time (=T) is given as the sum of the rainfall on the pixels of which arrival time is less than T. A simulation study to generate the hydrograph has been made on the following for cases.
Conclusion The authors have succeeded to develop the flood flow model with the following functions
Fig. 8 Hydrograph simulation Fig 9 Drainage pattern and DTM Fig 9 is the drainage pattern image combined with the DTM. Fig. 10 is the birdeye view image using the drainage pattern and LANDSAT TM image. As can be seen in these images, this model is useful to predict the flood disaster visibly. References
|