| 
 
      Estimation of water quality 
      using GIS data and Landsat TM data 
 M. Shizukuishi, O. Imai, and H. Takeuchi
 Systems 
      Engineering Center, Pasco corporation
 No. 13-5, 2-chome 
      Higashiyama,
 Meguro-ku, Tokyo Japan
 
 Abstract
 Remote Sensing technology offers a 
      wider latitude of potential application when combined with excels in 
      storage, manipulation and analysis of geographic information and 
      socio-economic data. In the study, it was attempted to divide the study 
      area (waters) I sections by means of GIS in dealing with Landsat TM data 
      in a bid to estimate water quality at actual water quality could be 
      emphasized for analysis by dividing the study area instead of dealing in 
      one whole area to make more realistic estimation imagery possible to be 
      developed, thus confirming the usefulness of GIS 
      data.
 
 Introduction
 Combination of GIS (Geographic 
      Information System) and remote sensing technologies is a natural 
      development in response to the technological needs of recent years. For 
      GIS, remote sensing data including Ladnsat data are one of the most 
      important sources of information. They provide the latest information in a 
      form readily adaptable to computers and available for use in time series. 
      So that the integration of remote sensing data in GIS is most meaningful 
      for creation of a smaller map scale GIS while eliminating problems 
      involved in the usually cumbersome process of data input in computers.
 
 On the other hand, GIS has an excellent technology to offer in 
      manipulation and analysis of volume data that can be applied most 
      effectively to remote sensing data. GIS is equipped with data in other 
      fields that complement remote sensing data, such as geographic information 
      based on smaller administrative units like cities, towns and villages, and 
      socio-economic data derived form the census. Theses two technologies when 
      combined effectively provide wider attitude of potential applications than 
      when applied individually.
 
 The integration of these two 
      technologies, however, was not free from problems in the past despite the 
      awareness of its greater potential. There were problems due tot eh ever 
      expanding size of computer systems for GIS and remote sensing data 
      processing and, more importantly, the difference in data storage methods 
      between GIS and remote sensing data. Today as a result of rapid progress 
      in hardware and software, the two technologies are feasible on the one 
      same hardware system.
 
 One such example is a combination of 
      ARC/INFO (a proprietary system of ESI, USA), a leading vector type of GIS 
      software, and Erdas (similarly of ERDAS, USA) that are in operation as 
      PASCO where the author belongs. In this study, applicability or usefulness 
      of GIS data was examined for estimation of water quality as a leading 
      indicator of the aquatic environment.
 
 Data and study 
      area
 Tokyo Bay as the study area serves as an entrances to the 
      sea-borne traffic bound for Cosmopolitan Tokyo with direct bearings on the 
      daily life of citizens. The bay itself is enclosed (surrounded by 
      metropolitan Tokyo, Kanagawa and Chiba Prefectures), deep inside, and very 
      narrow at its mouth restricting a free influx of outside sea water while 
      allowing large volumes of pollutants into the bay via rivers, which in 
      turn add to biological productivity to cause what is commonly known as 
      "red water" a phenomenon caused by masses of dead planktons and observed 
      every year.
 
 The water quality of the bay, therefore, is 
      characteristically subject to tidal currents and river waters and reflect 
      the different aquatic environments along the coast sea and the inside sea. 
      The characteristic was further examined in the present study by using 
      Landsat TM data and the aquatic environment database built on ARC/INFO.
 
        TM dataThe data were selected for study in such a manner 
        that they were of the same dates as those of water quality data and from 
        periods when atmospheric conditions ere relatively stable. The selected 
        data were as follows.
 
 Path-row : 107-035 and 107-036 Dates : 1) 
        August 6, 1986 2) March 2, 1987 Correction : Status corrected
 
 
Water quality dataThe water quality of Tokyo bay has been 
        monitored regularly at the 51 survey stations located in the surrounding 
        Tokyo, Kanagwa and Chiba for the past five years. Based on these data as 
        input, chronological and spatial analyses were made with respect to the 
        study area.
 ![]() Figure 1. Location map of survey stations 1 
      ~ 51 : Survey stations Methodology
 The study 
      flow is schematically shown in Figure 2 
       
        Preprocessing Since the study area was covered by two 
        scenes of TM data as purchased, mosaicking was performed in the lien 
        direction, followed by geometric correction to make TM data properly 
        correspond to water quality data on the 1/50,000 topographic 
map.
 
 
Data inputWater quality data were input in a computer in 
        a uniform format for chronological and spatial analyses that followed. 
        The bathymetric map as digitized in polygons for input.
 
 
Inner correlation Inner correlation were computer to 
        examine the distinctions between the bands of TM data and between the 
        water quality survey items. Based on the computation results, the bands 
        with lower values of correlation were applied for the analysis.
 
 
Analysis of water quality 
 
 
          Chronological analysis : As Seasonal changes in the 
          aquatic environment by developing graphs for such changes.
 
 
Spatial analysis : To identify the spatial 
          characteristics of the study area, cluster classification was applied 
          to the typical water quality data for summertime in an attempt to 
          classify water masses. A similar attempt was made for the August 6, 
          1986 data.
 
Data overlay To Consider a topographic impact on the 
        aquatic environment, TM data were overlaid on the bathymetric map in the 
        computer by means of the Live Link to connect ARC/INFO and 
Erdas.
 
 
Water quality Estimation using Landsat DataIn the water 
        quality analysis, multiple regression analysis was applied to determine 
        correlations between TM data and water quality data. Analysis was made 
        in the following terms considering the characteristics of remote sensing 
        data.
 
 
 
          Chlorophyll - a 
          SS (Suspended sediment) 
          Turbidity 
          Water temperature ![]() Figure 2. Study 
      FlowStudy results
 
        Chronological analysis : To find about the chronological 
        changes in sea water in terms of physical properties, nutritional base 
        density, and turbidity due to organic material the coastal sea and the 
        inside sea were studied respectively for turbidity, salinity, T-N, 
        PO4-P, and COD, whose chronological changes in average values were as 
        shown in figure 3. From the figure, it was found as follows:
 
 
 
          Turbidity, Salinity, and COD change in regular yearly patterns at 
          both locations, coastal sea and inside sea.
 
With respect to the inside sea data, the PO4 - P COD 
          data of Jun 1985 were conspicuously greater than rest of data CHA 
          values for the locations were also found to be substantially high. 
          They were considered to reflect the massive red water that prevailed 
          at the particular time.
 
PO4 - P in the coastal sea shows a tendency to decrease 
          and Cod to increase. 
 ![]() Figure 3. Chronological changes in Major 
        water quality by item
 (April 1980 - March 1988)
 
 
Correlations between Water Quality ItemsA matrix was 
        developed to determine correlations between water quality items with 
        respect to the coast and the inside sea using all data from all relevant 
        stations. The matrix is shown in table 1.
 
 
Spatial Analysis In order to define the spatial 
        characteristics of the study area, water quality at each station was 
        summarily represented in a graph using the box plot chart showing ranges 
        of fluctuation of water quality for each station, as shown in figure 4. 
        From the figure, the following characteristics were derived.
 
 
 
          Generally, the differences between the station and the ranges of 
          fluction at each station were both larger in the coastal sea.
 
With respect to nutrition base in the coastal sea density of 
          nitrogen type base at st. 1 and 2, phosphatic at st. 12, and both 
          densities at st. 7 and 9, were by far higher than those at other 
          station. The high densities are possible attributable to the waste 
          water discharged from water processing plant at st. 1, 2 and 
          12.
 
In the inside sea, salinity fluctuate widely at st. 15 due to its 
          location at river mouth.
 
NH4 - N is gradually oxidized in the environment to 
          turn into NO2 - N and NO3 - N. Therefore, 
          NH-N/DIN is lower in the inside sea than in the coastal 
        sea. ![]() Figure 4. Fluctuations in Water quality at 
      respective stations
 (April 1980 - March 1988)
 
 Table 1: 
      Water quality item correlation matrix
 
 
        
        Discussion
          | COASTAL SEA |  
          | INSIDE SEA |  | WT | TRS | DO | COD | T-N | T-P | SAL | NH4 | NO2 | NO3 | PO4 | TOC | DOC | CHL |  
          | WT |  | -0.425 | -0.045 | 0.343 | -0.016 | 0.234 | -0.518 | -0.074 | 0.391 | 0.138 | 0.190 | 0.335 | 0.242 | " |  
          | TRS | -0.461 |  | 0.288 | -0.614 | -0.269 | -0.348 | 0.530 | -0.232 | -0.168 | -0.102 | -0.277 | -0.573 | -0.461 | " |  
          | DO | 0.027 | -0.194 |  | 0.488 | 0.034 | -0.072 | 0.122 | 0.018 | -0.057 | -0.083 | -0.206 | 0.466 | 0.194 | " |  
          | COD | -0.549 | -0.618 | -0.436 |  | 0.577 | 0.425 | -0.490 | 0.524 | -0.292 | -0.004 | 0.306 | 0.859 | 0.713 | " |  
          | T-N | 0.173 | -0.391 | -0.107 | 0.497 |  | 0.453 | -0.526 | 0.943 | 0.301 | -0.059 | 0.472 | 0.539 | 0.730 | " |  
          | T-P | 0.370 | -0.409 | -0.179 | 0.563 | 0.787 |  | -0.517 | 0.386 | 0.170 | -0.261 | 0.960 | 0.424 | 0.451 | " |  
          | SAL | -0.577 | 0.510 | -0.221 | -0.426 | -0.525 | -0.484 |  | -0.434 | -0.418 | -0.397 | -0.535 | -0.428 | -0.506 | " |  
          | NH4 | -0.124 | -0.157 | -0.245 | 0.178 | 0.796 | 0.633 | -0.250 |  | 0.225 | -0.147 | 0.413 | 0.500 | 0.705 | " |  
          | NO2 | 0.216 | -0.157 | -0.013 | 0.217 | 0.465 | 0.322 | -0.260 | 0.139 |  | -0.125 | 0.164 | 0.235 | 0.281 | " |  
          | NO3 | 0.099 | -0.171 | -0.282 | 0.027 | 0.382 | 0.185 | -0.604 | 0.157 | 0.094 |  | 0.296 | -0.045 | -0.020 | " |  
          | PO4 | 0.167 | -0.168 | -0.497 | 0.115 | 0.671 | 0.833 | -0.393 | 0.680 | 0.308 | 0.246 |  | 0.317 | 0.416 | " |  
          | TOC | 0.544 | -0.581 | 0.442 | 0.442 | 0.457 | 0.521 | -0.373 | 0.161 | 0.167 | -0.012 | 0.080 |  | 0.854 | " |  
          | DOC | 0.467 | -0.540 | 0.213 | 0.704 | 0.553 | 0.510 | -0.427 | 0.343 | 0.188 | -0.101 | 0.255 | 0.839 |  | " |  
          | CHL | 0.470 | -0.447 | 0.833 | 0.833 | 0.260 | 0.436 | -0.236 | -0.001 | 0.177 | -0.091 | -0.043 | 0.827 | 0.539 |  |  From the 
      analysis results, correlations between water quality and TM data were 
      found to be greater in the following items. 
       
        SummaryAmount of Chlorophyll-a in areas susceptible to river water / TM 
        data.
 
Amount of S in sea water / TM data
 
Temperature / Band 6
 
Amount of chlorophyll - a in inside sea/TM data chlorophyll -a 
        estimation images as of August 8, 1986 and March 2, 1987 are shown as 
        examples. In the present study, water quality 
      estimation images were developed according to observation time and water 
      depths to enhance the correlation coefficients for relations between water 
      quality and TM data. From the results, the following can be said. 
       
        ReferenceIt is clearly important to consider the impact of tidal current when 
        Landsat TM data are compared to water quality.
 
Division of the coastal area and the inside sea definitely helped to 
        define the relations between TM data and water 
      quality. 
        The Institute of Statistical Mathematics. Studies of sample Surveys 
        for Environmental Measurement, 1989. 
        Dangermond, J. The software toolbox approach to meeting the user's 
        needs workshop 
1986. |